Give accessibility a place in delivery
Sustained progress needs clear ownership and a plan that fits the organisation. We help teams understand their current position, agree priorities and connect accessibility work with business needs and delivery cycles.
The engagement can cover a product, a portfolio or a wider programme. We work with the relevant leaders and delivery teams to define the scope and the decisions the programme needs to support.
A programme grounded in standards
We connect ISO/IEC 30071-1:2019 with your organisation’s responsibilities, procurement and delivery practices. UAE programmes include applicable national policy requirements and Design System expectations, with clear owners and review points.
Your roadmap distinguishes technical targets such as WCAG and PDF/UA from broader policy and regulatory obligations. Where Section 508, EN 301 549 or the EAA is relevant, we agree the assessment and reporting evidence needed for the products and services in scope.
Direction, evidence and continuity
Direction and planning
Assess accessibility maturity and develop priorities and roadmaps tied to business needs, with responsibilities and progress measures.
Conformance reporting
Prepare Accessibility Conformance Reports using the VPAT template, alongside accessibility statements that explain scope, method and findings.
Ongoing assurance
Support delivery through embedded expertise, progress tracking and periodic reviews as services and teams change.
Reporting that supports informed decisions
A VPAT is a reporting template; the completed, product-specific document is an Accessibility Conformance Report. Its value comes from the assessment evidence and the clarity of its findings. We select the appropriate VPAT edition for WCAG, Section 508 or EN 301 549 reporting and record the assessment scope, evidence and limitations.
Build a programme around real decisions
An accessibility roadmap should make it easier to decide what happens next. We consider the services people rely on, the organisation’s current capability and the responsibilities shared between product, technology, content, procurement and leadership teams.
Priorities can combine immediate barriers with changes that improve future delivery. For example, addressing a critical journey can sit alongside introducing a design review, improving supplier evidence or developing the skills needed to check the next release.
The result is a plan with responsibilities, dependencies and review points. Measures should reflect the work: the status of agreed findings, completion of important checks, team capability and the recurrence of issues across releases.
Keep evidence connected to the product
Conformance reports and accessibility statements need a clear relationship to the assessed product and its current state. We help teams explain scope and limitations, identify when evidence needs updating and establish a workable review process.
Ongoing assurance can include embedded expertise, discussions of findings and periodic reviews. The frequency and level of support are agreed around the pace of change and the responsibilities your team retains.
Starting from your current position
Do we need a mature accessibility programme?
No. The starting point may be a first assessment, an existing backlog or a programme that needs clearer ownership. We use the current position to agree useful priorities.
Can you support a specific procurement requirement?
We can discuss the required conformance evidence, the product in scope and the assessment needed to support it. Reporting is based on findings and the requirements agreed for the engagement.
Plan the next stage of your programme
Tell us about your priorities, current responsibilities and reporting needs.
Discuss strategy and governance